Differences of opinion vs faulty reason from a valid premise

Introduction to Argument Structure of a Logical Argument Whether we are consciously aware of it or not, our arguments all follow a certain basic structure. They begin with one or more premises, which are facts that the argument takes for granted as the starting point. Then a principle of logic is applied in order to come to a conclusion.

Differences of opinion vs faulty reason from a valid premise

Faulty Comparison also known as: Comparing one thing to another that is really not related, in order to make one thing look more or less desirable than it really is. Broccoli has significantly less fat than the leading candy bar!

While both broccoli and candy bars can be considered snacks, comparing the two in terms of fat content and ignoring the significant difference in taste, leads to the false comparison. Religion may have been wrong about a few things, but science has been wrong about many more things!

We are comparing a method of knowledge science to a system of belief faithwhich is not known for revising itself based on new evidence. Science is all about improving ideas to get closer to the truth, and, in some cases, completely throwing out theories that have been proven wrong.

Furthermore, the claims of religion are virtually all unfalsifiablethus cannot be proven wrong. Therefore, comparing religion and science on the basis of falsifiability is a faulty comparison. Comparisons of any kind almost always are flawed. Think carefully before you accept any kind of comparison as evidence.

Do we call it a false comparison when people compare raw data with the item in a standard? Or is there a better kind of logical fallacy to which we can refer?Jun 06,  · 1. Consider the following statement: Most disagreements or differences of opinion are more often a result of faulty, misunderstood, or confusing premises, rather than faulty reason from a valid vilakamelia.com: Resolved.

Differences of opinion vs faulty reason from a valid premise

Feb 28,  · Consider the following statement: Most disagreements or differences of opinion are more often a result of faulty, misunderstood, or confusing premises, rather than faulty reason from a valid premise.

Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your answer. 2. however, the differences between a and b are strong enough to make the comparison invalid. In everyday language, a faulty analogy is "like comparing apples to oranges" Premise of Contention.

Consider the following statement: Most disagreements or differences of opinion are more often a result of faulty, misunderstood, or confusing Consider the following statement: Most disagreements or differences of opinion are more often a result of faulty, misunderstood, or confusing premises, rather than faulty reason from a valid premise.

BCOM/ August 1.

Differences of opinion vs faulty reason from a valid premise

Allyn Lean, BA, B Commerce, MSc Management Discussion Questions Week 2 Consider the following statement: Most disagreements or differences of opinion are more often a result of faulty, misunderstood, or confusing premises, rather than faulty reason from a valid premise.

BCOM/ August 1. Allyn Lean, BA, B Commerce, MSc Management Discussion Questions Week 2 Consider the following statement: Most disagreements or differences of opinion are more often a result of faulty, misunderstood, or confusing premises, rather than faulty reason from a valid premise.

Yahoo ist jetzt Teil von Oath